Tecno Camon 19 Neo vs Samsung Galaxy A23
![Текно Камон 19 Нео](https://nanoreview.net/common/images/phone/tecno-camon-19-neo-mini.jpeg)
![Самсунг Галакси А23](https://nanoreview.net/common/images/phone/samsung-galaxy-a23-mini.jpeg)
Here we compared two budget smartphones: the 6.8-inch Tecno Camon 19 Neo (with MediaTek Helio G85) that was released on June 15 2022 against the Samsung Galaxy A23 which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 and came out 4 months before. On this page you will find tests full specs strengths and weaknesses of each of the gadgets.
- Differences
- Review
- Specs
- Benchmarks
- Battery life
- Camera
- Comments
Key differences
An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy A23- Higher display refresh rate – 90 Hz
- Optical image stabilization
- More energy-efficient CPU – Snapdragon 680
- Has an ultra-wide angle camera lens
- Faster storage type - UFS 2.2 versus eMMC 5.1
- Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
- 11% faster in single-core GeekBench 5 test: 387 and 350 points
Review
Display Screen quality color accuracy brightness Camon 19 Neo 68 Galaxy A23 72 Performance CPU/GPU performance in apps and games Camon 19 Neo 32 Galaxy A23 32 Battery Battery life charging type and speed Camon 19 Neo 78 Galaxy A23 85 Camera Photo and video recording quality Camon 19 Neo 58 Galaxy A23 63 Connectivity Networks ports data transmission Camon 19 Neo 71 Galaxy A23 77 NanoReview score Final comparison evaluation Camon 19 Neo 59 Galaxy A23 63Value for money
You can enter your local price of these phones (in USD or any other currency) and click on the "Calculate" button to see which one has a better value for money. Tecno Camon 19 Neo Price Samsung Galaxy A23 CalculateTests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and tests Phone: Camon 19 Neo vs Galaxy A23Display
Type | IPS LCD | PLS TFT |
Size | 6.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels | 1080 x 2408 pixels |
Aspect ratio | 20.5:9 | 20:9 |
PPI | 395 ppi | 400 ppi |
Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 90 Hz |
Max rated brightness | - | 460 nits |
HDR support | No | No |
Screen protection | Tempered glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
Screen-to-body ratio | 84.6% | 83% |
Design and build
Height | 168.84 mm (6.65 inches) | 164.5 mm (6.48 inches) |
Width | 76.94 mm (3.03 inches) | 76.9 mm (3.03 inches) |
Thickness | 8.47 mm (0.33 inches) | 8.4 mm (0.33 inches) |
Weight | - | 195 gramm (6.88 oz) |
Waterproof | No | No |
Rear material | Plastic | Plastic |
Frame material | Plastic | Plastic |
Colors | Black Blue Green | White Black Blue Yellow |
Fingerprint scanner | Yes in home button | Yes in home button |
Performance
Tests of Tecno Camon 19 Neo and Samsung Galaxy A23 in the benchmarksChipset | MediaTek Helio G85 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 |
Max. clock | 2000 MHz | 2400 MHz |
CPU cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (4 + 4) |
Architecture | - 6 cores at 1.8 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 2 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A75 | - 4 cores at 1.9 GHz: Kryo 265 Silver (Cortex-A53) - 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Kryo 265 Gold (Cortex-A73) |
Lithography process | 12 nanometers | 6 nanometers |
Graphics | Mali-G52 MP2 | Adreno 610 |
GPU clock | 1000 MHz | 1114 MHz |
FLOPS | ~59 GFLOPS | - |
RAM size | 6 GB | 4 6 8 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Channels | 2 | 2 |
Storage size | 128 GB | 32 64 128 GB |
Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.2 |
Memory card | - | MicroSD |
Memory card max. size | - | Up to 1024 GB |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 5 (Single-Core) Camon 19 Neo 350 Galaxy A23 +11% 387 Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core) Camon 19 Neo 1265 Galaxy A23 +30% 1646 AnTuTu Benchmark 9 Camon 19 Neo n/a Galaxy A23 269617CPU | - | 81885 |
GPU | - | 48510 |
Memory | - | 64789 |
UX | - | 71783 |
Total score | - | 269617 |
Stability | - | 98% |
Graphics test | - | 2 FPS |
Graphics score | - | 439 |
PCMark 3.0 score | - | 7180 |
Software
Operating system | Android 12 | Android 12 |
ROM | HIOS 8.6 | One UI 4.1 |
OS size | - | 24 GB |
Battery
Capacity | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
Charge power | 18 W | 25 W |
Replaceable | No | No |
Wireless charging | No | No |
Reverse charging | No | No |
Fast charging | Yes (50% in 60 min) | Yes (32% in 30 min) |
Full charging time | 2:32 hr | 1:43 hr |
Web browsing | - | 13:42 hr |
Watching video | - | 12:41 hr |
Gaming | - | 06:33 hr |
Standby | - | 127 hr |
Camera
Specs and camera test of smartphonesMatrix | 48 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
Image resolution | 8000 x 6000 | 8700 x 5800 |
Zoom | Digital | Digital |
Flash | Quad LED | LED |
Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
8K video recording | No | No |
4K video recording | No | No |
1080p video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 30FPS |
Slow motion | - | 120 FPS (720p) |
Lenses | 2 (48 MP + 2 MP) | 4 (50 MP + 5 MP + 2 MP + 2 MP) |
Wide (main) lens | - 48 MP - Aperture: f/1.8 - Focal length: 26 mm - Pixel size: 0.8 micron - Sensor: 1/2.0" (CMOS) - Phase autofocus | - 50 MP - Aperture: f/1.8 - Focal length: 26 mm - Phase autofocus - Optical stabilization |
Ultra-wide lens | - | - 5 MP - Aperture: f/2.2 - Pixel size: 1.12 micron - Sensor: 1/5" (CMOS) |
Macro lens | - | - 2 MP - Aperture: f/2.4 |
Depth lens | - 2 MP - Aperture: f/2.4 | - 2 MP - Aperture: f/2.4 |
Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
Megapixels | 32 megapixels | 8 megapixels |
Image resolution | - | 3264 x 2448 |
Aperture | f/2.5 | f/2.2 |
Focal length | 26 mm | - |
Pixel size | 0.8 microns | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
Connectivity
Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
Bluetooth version | 5 | 5 |
Bluetooth features | LE | PBAP/PAB PAN OPP MAP HSP HID HFP DIP AVRCP A2DP |
USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
USB version | 2 | 2 |
USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
GPS | GPS GLONASS Beidou Galileo | GPS GLONASS Beidou Galileo QZSS |
NFC* | Depends on the region | Yes |
Infrared port | No | No |
Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
eSIM support* | No | No |
Hybrid slot | No | No |
LTE Cat* | 7 | - |
5G support | No | No |
Sound
Speakers | Mono | Mono |
Headphone audio jack | Yes | Yes |
FM radio | Yes | - |
Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Other
Category | Budget | Budget |
Announced | June 2022 | March 2022 |
Release date | July 2022 | March 2022 |
Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Fingerprint | - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Compass - Fingerprint |
Conclusion
These smartphones have a lot in common but we would recommend the Samsung Galaxy A23. It has a better display software battery life camera connectivity and sound.
Cast your vote
So which phone would you choose? Tecno Camon 19 Neo 0 (0%) Samsung Galaxy A23 0 (0%) Vote Total votes: <, 1Related comparisons
1. Oppo Realme Narzo 50 or Tecno Camon 19 Neo 2. Tecno Camon 19 or Camon 19 Neo 3. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 or Samsung Galaxy A23 4. Samsung Galaxy A12 or Galaxy A23 5. Samsung Galaxy A32 or Galaxy A23 6. Samsung Galaxy A22 or Galaxy A23 7. Samsung Galaxy M32 or Galaxy A23User opinions
You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below Name Message Send Sendsource nanoreview.net
Tecno K7 Features And Specifications - From Tecno Spark Series
Tecno Launches Entry-Level POP2F in Pakistan - The Review Master
Introducing Tecno Spot Tecnos Official Online Community
TECNO
Tecno Official Store
TECNO P701 FIRMWARE - Download Firmware Terbaru
TECNO
Tecno Mega
Cerchas de Acero TECNO FRAME
La campa a de Ushuaia para fortalecer el turismo - IMPULSO
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Stock Wallpaper 1242x2688 - 11
Desde Mendoza L-Gante present su vino del Valle de Uco Tinty 420
Los mejores lugares de Noruega para ver las auroras boreales
Fall Phone Wallpaper - 053
Whatsapp Wallpaper 006